|
|
|
|
|
|
Spockie-Tech
Site Admin
Joined: 31 May 2004
Posts: 3160
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Jakes comment about "buying the fuel up-front " is a good summary of E.V.'s
We used to say the same thing with Electric Heli's vs Nitro Heli's.
The Nitro motors are cheaper than equivalent powered Brushless+ESC+Battery+Charger combo, but you pay a lot more for fuel each time you run the motor, whereas the Electricity to recharge your batteries is much cheaper.
For accurate TCO (Total Cost of Ownership) comparison, You also need to take into account lifetime/deterioration and repairs and maintenaince/consumables (oil, plugs, and filters) of your combustion motor (and its many auxillary systems, cooling, exhaust etc) on one hand,
and the same of your The EV systems. Which mostly dont suffer anywhere near as much deterioration/consumables as a combustion motor system. Mishaps discounted, your Motor, ESC and Charging systems dont deteriorate at any appreciable rate and dont require any consumables.
Of course, the eternal phrase - Batteries not included. They *do suffer deterioration and require eventual replacement.
So, your EV costs all come down to what you choose to use battery wise.
Which is determined by your expectations of performance and range.
If you have a small lightweight car and you are happy with a top speed of 70/80 km/hr (wind resistance increases dramatically at high speed increasing power consumption) with modest acceleration and only need to commute <50km to work and can recharge during the day, then you can get away with relatively cheap and heavy (so a small kw/hr pack) lead acid batteries.
Effectively what you have is what is called a N.E.V. (Neighbourhood Electric Vehicle) which will get you to the shops and work and back, which covers about 90% of most peoples travel requirements. and is largely inefficient travelling (lots of slow, idling, repeated accel/decel time, in traffic)
If you want to head off on an interstate trip, tow a trailer, or load up the family for a day trip to the nearest city/beach/mountain, then you fire up the Dino-Juice burner and use a vehicle that is designed for sustained high power/load travelling and isnt spending most of its time chugging away at the lights doing nothing useful.
If you want to combine both functions in the one vehicle, then you are looking at large lithium (or maybe NiMH) battery packs, bigger motors, gruntier speed controllers and faster higher current chargers and the cost starts spiralling upwards.
One cheap work around is to put an auxillary battery pack in a trailer you keep at home when doing N.E.V. work, and just hook up when you need longer range on occasion allowing you to cart a smaller battery pack for ordinary use.
You can save some dollars building your own ESC from the open source plans available out there, and a simple cheat used by some on a budget is to use a contactor that engages for full-power, bypassing the ESC altogether and allowing you to use a lower rated ESC for part throttle operation but still giving you full power for climbing hills.
If you are looking for professionalism of course, just buy a 'Zilla or supposedly the Kellys have improved a fair bit these days.
Depending on useage patterns, you can register the Dino-burner on limited-use "Club" registration and insurance, which lets you use it a couple of times a week and pay full reg for the EV. Thus not have to pay two lots of full reg/insurance for owning a NEV and a Fuel-Burner.
OR you can just shell out the $$ and buy the latest Tesla Model S.
http://theoatmeal.com/comics/tesla_model_s
That option isnt likely to appeal to a Robot Builder though _________________ Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events. Small minds discuss people
|
Sat Jul 26, 2014 4:24 pm |
|
|
|
Spockie-Tech
Site Admin
Joined: 31 May 2004
Posts: 3160
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
quote:
Originally posted by dyrodium:
Ahh this is why I love this community so much, you guys are such a wealth of knowledge.
Opinions anyway, considering that none us has actually built road-registered EV's (possibly DumHed ?),
I dont know that Id call it *knowledge*
quote:
> Very true, it is a bit naive to approach EV's from a 'saving money' angle, not gonna happen.
It *can, you just have to take the long view and design carefully, The deck is stacked against lone builders, because they are doing difficult, unique custom one-offs which require skilled engineers rather than just factory assemblers and you're buying gear in any significant quantity to attract bulk discounts, unlike manufacturers, who buy in 10k lots.
quote:
Haha running with hobbykring cells... Considering a Lipo EV is a driving bomb, I think I'll pass .... >_>
Whereas a big tank of liquid petrol is.. what ? we're just *used to that
quote:
I really don't think SLA will cut it for the performance I'd be after, it's only a small car
Which is why SLA *is an option. Unless you define performance to equal long range + high speed + high load.
Remember - The Peukert Value is the thing to consider when sizing batteries. SLA's can do OK, provided you dont try to discharge them too quickly.. (Robot Wars and our 3 minute matches are about the nastiest thing you can do to an SLA ) Most are rated at a 20 hr discharge. Design a car and pack combo that eats them up in 1 hour and you are wasting a lot of capacity to internal heat. (you could use them as your demister ! )
If you size the pack and motor power consumption appropriately, then given their low purchase and replacement cost and lack of BMS (Battery Management System) requirements, they can be a good choice for a low powered lightweight NEV. Ive read of quite a few of them that perform quite well on a pack that cost less than $1k, instead of upwards of $3k, so dont write them off to get started, unless you have plenty of money to play with and want to go for the newest expensive tech straight off the bat.
Lithiums *are undoubtably better, but they are more fragile, require BMS, trickier chargers, a *lot more expensive, and have unproven lifetimes at this time. (AFAIK). so whether they will prove to be better for 2 or 3 years, then down to 50% and please-replace-me status only time will tell.
What I would like to see is the new Low-Self-Discharge (LSD) Nickel Metal Hydride Technology (Sayno EneLoop) scaled up to EV cell size. Surely that pesky Ovonics Patent has expired by now ?
Take a look at White-Zombie from Plasma Boy Racing - http://www.plasmaboyracing.com/whitezombie.php
He ran SLAs for a long time in his drag Car and did remarkably well because he matched the pack size to the current draw properly. He eventually upgraded to lithiums, but it cost him 5x as much to go 1 second faster.
I plan on Electrifying the Ge-Min-E as my next Automotive project once the Charger is finished. (getting close !), so I keep half an eye on interesting developments in the EV scene. Be keen to see how you go.
Good Luck
regards
Brett _________________ Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events. Small minds discuss people
|
Sun Jul 27, 2014 4:13 pm |
|
|
|
|
Spockie-Tech
Site Admin
Joined: 31 May 2004
Posts: 3160
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
quote:
Originally posted by DumHed:
I wouldn't bother with SLAs at all - they tend to have a life span of 6 months to 2 years - so lithium actually works out cheaper in the long run, as well as giving *much* better performance.
OK, Good Point
There *are SLA's that will do fairly well in an EV, Being Deep-cycle rated, and if you can limit them to <80% Depth of Discharge (DOD) and not run them nearly flat, they will last 5+ years, but such batteries do tend to be more expensive that your garden variety SLA's, so probably the margin over the getting-cheaper Lithiums is closing.
but keep in mind I havent seen any evidence of hard-worked Lithium Packs lasting more than 2 or 3 years yet either, and the replacement cost is higher.
Anyway, if $10k for a conversion doesnt scare you off, then its probably a moot point, youre up in lithium land with that kind of price ticket anyway.
Im still hoping something will appear with the Patent Expiry on large format NiMH batteries soon too. they are proven long life, less violent that lithium, much cheaper and offer fairly good power/weight/price ratios. _________________ Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events. Small minds discuss people
|
Mon Jul 28, 2014 12:02 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
|