|
kkeerroo
Experienced Roboteer
Joined: 17 Jun 2004
Posts: 1459
Location: Brisbane
|
So did Andrew just prove that these great Fail safe's everyone must buy don't alway work like I keep hearing about? Good on Andrew.
quote:
Originally posted by Spockie-Tech:
Speaking officially, Robots are not allowed to be powered up in the pits *at all*. This is to keep the insurance companies happy. Other Event Operators may have different opinions according to their willingness to accept liability for pit-accidents.
So my brother will be banned from going to all events now. Everyone knows the roar when he bench tests Hellbringer before every fight.
quote:
Originally posted by Spockie-Tech:
If you get scooped from the side and cant go back and forwards enough to get free, then after 30 seconds, Mel would be required to make an attempt to reverse away from you, and if she was unable to do so, she will say "I'm stuck" then the robots would be considered jammed together and a pause would called to seperate them.
This will be the only time either of us mention this. How about the the 2 1m long skid marks on the RoboWars 2 arena floor from when Scoopy was pushing KO for about 1 minute. On the video you can here Mel yell "He's not getting out of the scoop" yet Scoopy makes no turning or reversing twitches. After comparing the video and skid marks it looks to me and my brother that Scoopy was always pushing into KO for that full minute. Moving toward your opponent is an aggressive move, so Scoopy should have been disqualified.
Sorry, been wanting to point that out for a while.
quote:
Originally posted by Spockie-Tech:
The hold/release rule is 30 seconds.
As far as "completely free" goes, at a guess, I would say anything that results in complete seperation of the robots would be considered "free" - there is nothing in the rules that I know of that requires someone to move away a significant distance giving a spinner a chance to spin-up again or anything like that. If they can keep you cornered without "pinning" you (physical contact), good for them. Does anyone else know otherwise or think this should be interpreted differently ?
This should count against wedges too. Scarifier was on Cheeze Wedges wedge without its wheels in contact with anything for 45 seconds. No wonder I felt peeved off after that fight.
Also I always thought the rule was robots must be free'ed before 30 seconds are up. Vinny Blood used to have a stop watch to time Razer's attacks and yell out warnings at 20 and 25 seconds to make sure the opponent is free at the 30 second mark so Razer wouldn't get disqualified.
Ok, I'll stop bitching now. _________________ Get Some!!!
Secretary of the Queensland Robotics Sports Club inc.
|
Wed Apr 27, 2005 1:03 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spockie-Tech
Site Admin
Joined: 31 May 2004
Posts: 3160
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
OK, This Thread is getting a bit out of hand with all the finger-pointing going on here..
I take it that anyone who has a problem with events past, is prepared to volunteer to be a referee/judge/safety inspector for the
entire
of the next event ? No ? Then you know someone who will ? No ? Perhaps you'd like to offer to pay someone to do that job then ? No again ? Then just what
are
you suggesting we do apart from bitching about it wthout a solution ?
@Andrew: your whining about unfairness and rule-breaking may well be being ignored for the simple reason that if there is anyone who is a prime example,
you
would have to be it. As the only person to be disqualified for lack of safety ("bah, I knew what I was doing") so far, the same person who got weighed in
then
went and added parts to their robot, and the same person who has repeatedly claimed they didnt need failsafe's, yet had their bot go out of control on more occasions than anyone else, what gets you ULTRA PISSED really doesnt interest me at all..
To everyone else, I agree that in many events past, count-outs, seperation, pinning and other aspects of match control have been below par, The problem is simple.. we dont have any non-competitors who are prepared to volunteer their services to be judges & referees who are also sufficiently familair with the rules & proceedures.
I tried to improve this at the last RoboWars event by printing out a "judging guidelines" sheet that all the judges were supposed to read to famiarise themselves with the rules, unfortunately, one of our pre-booked judges suddenly moved to queensland a week before the event, another became a team mechanic for Vincent and hence was unavailable for most of the event, and third couldnt make it for the whole weekend. Thus we had to juggle judges between competitors who werent in a match at the time, and things like count-outs and pin rules werent always enforced properly.
Same thing at Rye.. Rick did his best, and made some tough calls, but with the Drivers on opposite sides of the Arena, it was impossible to communicate with them both at the same time, which caused some confusion in a couple of matches about when the match had ended, when releases should have occurred and so on. To rectify this, Rye are now installing buttons and lights and so on so the drivers can be clearly informed as to the end of a match and time-outs etc.
If anyone else has any
constructive
suggestions, or would like to
volunteer
to be a judge or referee and spend the time to actually familarise themselves with the rules, please get in touch, I will be happy to hear from you.. Otherwise, STFU or go organise your own events and see how easy it is..
@glen: Scoopy does *NOT* have a half-pipe on the front to stop people from getting out of the tray. She has a stainless-steel ruler across the leading edge of the tray to stop it from getting bent upwards, and I was very careful to make the small lip at the back of it smooth by filling it with Polyurathane specifically to prevent people from getting stuck. _________________ Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events. Small minds discuss people
|
Wed Apr 27, 2005 6:57 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|