Should the lightweight class allow feather spinners as multibots |
Yes, those little egg-beaters dont bother me, bring em on |
|
61% |
[ 8 ] |
No, leave the feather lawn-mowers in their own class for now |
|
38% |
[ 5 ] |
|
Total Votes : 13 |
|
|
|
Spockie-Tech
Site Admin
Joined: 31 May 2004
Posts: 3160
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Possible Lightweight 27.27Kg (No Spinners) Class
And to stir things up a bit more..
we have also been considering the possibility of running a spinner-less lightweight class at RoboWars for a few reasons..
To give the overweight feathers somewhere to play
To let beginners to the sport have a class to build for without fear of being destroyed first time out
To make it easier for peole with stick-welders, steel and Lead-Acid batteries to build something competitive.
To give the builders who want walkers, clamps and other "heavy" types a start without fear of spinners.
To gradually build the lightweight class up, prepatory to improving the arena to allow for lightweight spinners
a couple of points to consider.
Initially we were thinking of allowing any of the feather class bots to compete as multi-bots in the lightweight class, but are now wondering if this is a good idea or not.
While a feather-class spinner is going to be at a serious disadvantage when fighting a lightweight class bot, TWO of them together (like Annihlation and Basilisk's "Dream Team" :lol) could still do some serious damage to a newbie lightweight, which is what we want to avoid *initially*.
Eventually spinners of both the lightweight class and multi-feather spinners will be allowed into this class, and the no-spinners rule will move up the next class to be introduced (middleweights), but this may take a while before we can afford thousands of dollars worth of extra lexan, and by then the existing lightweight competitors should have garnered some experience to cope with them..
If the other proposed weight change (to 13.6Kg/30lb) is accepted, then this would make the lightweight class 27.27Kg or 60lb inline with the USA.
The "No Spinners" rule is a vague one, since its a difficult line to draw clearly. ie. Should a lightweight thwack bot capable of doing 300 rpm body spins with a 5Kg hammer on the end be allowed ? What about saw blades ? they would contain less energy than the thwack bot would ? Do we calculate Kilojoules ?
Its all very muddy, and disturbing the rock-paper-scissors equation by eliminating the scissors seriously messes up the balance of the competition, possibly leading to a situation like the UK's where it sounds like self-righting flippers and invertible pushy bots are the only types most people build now. But we do intend to introduce the scissors back into this class later, and it also has the advantage that people can build bots that can be demo'd and practiced with reasonably safely outside of an arena..
The final say on whether a bot is classed as a spinner or not would have to go down to the Event Operator, since its their sandbox (Arena), and their responsibility, so they get to say whether any bot can play there or not. So anyone thinking of being clever and pushing the envelope a bit with what can or cant be classed as a spinner, check first or risk getting sent home.
Again, comments, suggestions etc are welcome. _________________ Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events. Small minds discuss people
|
Wed Sep 15, 2004 10:58 am |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spockie-Tech
Site Admin
Joined: 31 May 2004
Posts: 3160
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
At present, we only have 6mm polycarb for the RoboWars arena, so Lightweight (whether 25 or 27.27Kg) spinners are definitely out.
Our original idea for the lightweight class was to give the "fat feathers" somewhere to go if they just couldnt make it down to the 12.2Kg limit we were thinking of, but now that it looks likely that the 13.6Kg limit will be adopted, the pressure is off a bit on those guys..
However, I'd still like to open the lightweight (no spinners) class up to builders who want to make something a bit bigger and chunkier, or build a heavy walker or clamp bot or something without risking getting it munched up while they get some experience.. Could be good for Davids new walker bot, or George's bigger clamps, and Gary has a lightweight flipper (Energise!) in the works..
I've got "The Acid Test" looking pretty in my living room, but since its a spinner, it wont be able to fight just yet either, and by the time it can fight, its probably going to be way outclassed, since it was the first bot we built way back when.. still, I'd like to get to thump something with it one day just to see what happens..
Anyway, I wont be offering any major prizes or anything for the lightweight class at the next RoboWars, so I dont expect everyone is going to rush there, but if you want to build a bigger bot, and a few do, then we'll find a way to fit you in.. _________________ Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events. Small minds discuss people
|
Thu Sep 16, 2004 11:37 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
Spockie-Tech
Site Admin
Joined: 31 May 2004
Posts: 3160
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
quote:
Originally posted by teamvertex:
Prizes! Bah, who needs them, we build bots for the challenge and the experince. Battling them is just a bonus
I agree with you Aaron, but you are forgetting something I've said before. Prizes aren't to make the existing builders happy.. they dont need encouragement to build a bot, they already know how much fun it is.
Prizemoney is to tempt newcomers into the game, its a glittery pot-of-gold that they can imagine themselves winning that will get them started on the journey. Once they're doing it, you hope that they will discover that it's the journey that is the fun part, rather than the destination, but you need to get them moving before they will find that out.
And besides, I'm sure that some $100 notes in your pocket on the way home will help to make you feel better about towing a trailer full of beaten up robots.. _________________ Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events. Small minds discuss people
|
Fri Sep 17, 2004 9:57 am |
|
|
|
|
|