|
|
leo-rcc
Joined: 04 Aug 2006
Posts: 231
Location: Hoogvliet, Netherlands
|
I am not exactly sure what you mean. If you want steering like a tank, there are 3 ways of doing so.
suppose you have a transmitter with 4 channels on 2 sticks
code:
1 3
2+ 4+
channel 1 left stick forward-reverse
channel 2 left stick lef-right
channel 3 right stick forward-reverse
channel 4 right stick left-right
Method 1:
- Buy 2 speed controllers capable of handeling your motor current and that operates in forward/stop/reverse
- connect the speed controllers to the battery and the motors, 1 speed controller for 1 motor.
- plug the first speed controller receiver cable in channel 1 of the receiver, the second in channel 3.
(check the manual for your TX, sometimes they are 1 and 2, sometime 1 and 4, depending on the layout of the manufacturer, 1 and 3 is quite common)
- make sure no mixing is turned on on the transmitter (most of the time it isn't but be sure there is no such option and if there is, turn it off).
- test forward and reverse on 1 stick, then test it on the other.
Method 2:
- Buy a dual motor speed controller like the IBC
- connect the 2 motors as described in the manual to the speed controller
- connect the battery to the speed controller
- set up the speed controller for tank style steering (it is usually in the manual hoe to do so)
- plug the speed controller in channel 1 and channel 3 of the receiver
(check the manual for your TX, sometimes they are 1 and 2, sometime 1 and 4, depending on the layout of the manufacturer, 1 and 3 is quite common).
- make sure no mixing is turned on on the transmitter (most of the time it isn't but be sure there is no such option and if there is, turn it off).
- test forward and reverse on 1 stick, then test it on the other.
Those are the 2 easiest solutions.
Method 3:
The harder one is making/buying 2 H-Bridges with double braking relays and attaching 1 motor to 1 h-bridge, 1 motor to the other. this has one serious downside, you only have 100% forward / stop / 100% reverse, and nothing in between. That does not make it for easy steering.
A diagram of this (thanks you Woody):
you would need 2 of these and 2 dual rc-switches to open and close the relays from your remote.
I would prefer method 1 or 2, the last one I would only do if I had no other option.
|
Wed Sep 12, 2007 10:45 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
Spockie-Tech
Site Admin
Joined: 31 May 2004
Posts: 3160
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Most transmitter sticks turn pots that have a resistance in the region of around 5K = 5000 Ohms.
Most Electric motors have winding resistances of less than 1 ohm
So your transmitter pots have about 5000 times as much resistance as your motors, meaning the motors are going to get about 1/5000th the power they require - you wont move far
Even if you could replace the pots with hypothetical 1ohm pots, you would still be using a resistor to control the power flow through the motors.
This means that any reduction in power/speed delivered to the motors is instead burned up inside your pots resistance.
Assuming your motors use somewhere between 10 and 100 amps at 12v, and you try to reduce the power to say half, then your pot needs to radiate somewhere between 60-600 watts worth of heat.
'Smokin (for a second or so, destruction immediately thereafter)
If there was an *easy* way to do speed control without spending hundreds of dollars on speed controllers, someone would have figured it out by now.
You should use (in order from cheapest to most expensive)
1. Servo driven Microswitches
2. Hacked Battery Drill Triggers (fiddly assembly required)
3. A Tank controller (George has posted links to some relatively cheap PicAxe powered ones before in the Tank threads)
4. a Picaxe relay controller (requires significant electronics skill to assemble)
5. a commercial ESC of some sort.
-- Electronizes are about the cheapest for the power rating.
-- Some RC Monster truck ones are ok if you dont have big motors and dont mind a small delay before reversing and run at low voltage.
-- a serious Robot Controller if you need serious power. (IBC, Sidewinder, etc) _________________ Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events. Small minds discuss people
|
Thu Sep 13, 2007 11:02 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|