|
|
Nick
Experienced Roboteer
Joined: 16 Jun 2004
Posts: 11802
Location: Sydney, NSW
|
Motor show
I couldn't get motivated to set up the rotary table tonight and finish off Jolt's motor mount, so here is a review of the motors from my vertical spinners:
Front left is the original motor from Mr Mangle, a Neu 1910 in-runner: 680 KV, 1.2KW cont, 2.4KW Max. The custom front end has dual bearings. The power rating and lower KV just isn't enough to spin up the beater without getting over heated. Other than that, it is a very solid motor that will probably be used as a backup.
Front right is the new motor from Mr Mangle, a Hacker A50 Turnado out-runner: 850 KV, 1.5KW cont, 3KW max. The motor mount has a needle roller bearing to support the 8mm shaft, which is definitely needed after a ball bearing disintegrated at the last event. although the power rating is only a little higher than the Neu 1910, the extra cooling from the built-in fan helps this motor spin Mr Mangle's beater up to a dangerous speed without getting too hot. It still needs a custom rear end-bell.
At the back left is the motor for Shiny (also known as Mr Mangle V2). It is a Neu 2210/24: 860KV, 2KW cont, 4KW max. The custom front end has dual bearings and large air vents. With an extra 1,000 watts of peak power over Mr Mangle's motors, the only question is whether the beater will explode on the first impact!
At the back right is Jolt's Kontronik Pyro 800 out-runner: 400KV, 5KW cont, 10KW max. The motor will be upgraded with a 10mm shaft and a front needle roller bearing in the next couple of days. After that, it may get squeezed into Mr Mangle for a spin-up test. _________________ Australian 2015 Featherweight champion
UK 2016 Gladiator champion
|
Wed Nov 26, 2014 11:37 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nick
Experienced Roboteer
Joined: 16 Jun 2004
Posts: 11802
Location: Sydney, NSW
|
Its hard to compare end mill prices; there are so many variations of coating, metal type, tolerances, etc that two similar looking cutters could have wildly different performances and cost.
Both of those cutters look 'high-end', with powered steel or carbide construction. Although they are small, I'd say the discount price is reasonable but they are probably wasted on a smaller manual mill. They look to be aimed at commercial CNC applications where bleeding edge performance equals more profit.
I only use carbide cutters when I need to mill titanium, otherwise I go for cobalt steel of just HSS at much lower cost and they last a long time in aluminium. One issue with carbide is that while its very hard and the cutting surfaces stay sharp, its also brittle and doesn't like shock - they can snap unexpectedly.
Both those cutters you linked to are aimed at steel; for soft & stringy materials, you want a coarse pitch, a higher helix angle (36 deg. is common) and fewer, larger flutes to clear the swarf quicker. Like Glen mentioned, a two flute slot cutter will do a pretty good job in plastic, where the large flutes help the chips to exit the cut. Roughing cutters tend to make little chips like snowflakes, which can be handy on deep cuts where the chips can build up and cause problems.
If you want to cut a variety of materials, with just one rougher, I would go for the fine pitched ones like you linked to; they will work in softer materials as long as you let the chips clear out, while a coarse pitched cutter will wear out in steel faster. _________________ Australian 2015 Featherweight champion
UK 2016 Gladiator champion
|
Mon Dec 01, 2014 8:21 am |
|
|
|