|
|
|
|
Knightrous
Site Admin
Joined: 15 Jun 2004
Posts: 8511
Location: NSW
|
Ah, the Skull Trail mobo
Shat loads more of information here:
http://www.tomshardware.com/2008/02/06/intel_skulltrail_part_1/
http://www.tomshardware.com/2008/02/07/intel_skulltrail_part_2/
http://www.tomshardware.com/2008/02/08/intel_skulltrail_part_3/
Conclusion:
quote:
Conclusions: Technologically Immature And Lacking Software Support
We were disappointed by the Skulltrail platform. Although we have tested and reviewed numerous Intel products, we have never had such a half-baked system such as this in our labs. If this sounds harsh, bear in mind that all we have to base this conclusion on is the Skulltrail system itself in its current state, which Intel provided as an official review platform. We do not know whether Intel plans to revise and improve the platform before the final versions ship to retail.
The Skulltrail system is unable to keep up with current desktop systems with a single quad-core processor by a long shot. We are not considering workstation applications here, since such applications are simply not the focus of the platform at this time. The main performance problems can be attributed to how Intel chose to use a chipset from the workstation segment, from the use of FB-DIMM memory and from the lack of widely multi-threaded software. Most applications can take advantage of four processors at most, meaning that the second quad-core CPU is practically never in use.
Also, the quality of the board is - simply put - very bad. Due to a lack of crucial options, the BIOS is not suited for overclocking, the Southbridge fan is far too loud, the PWM fan-speed regulation for the CPU cooler does not work and the board takes far too long to boot. Several times, the board even crashed when restarting.
It is incomprehensible why Intel would send a platform plagued with so many problems out to the press in such a rush. Currently, Intel is not under any kind of pressure from the competition - it has already proved that it makes the fastest CPUs in the market. So why create such a dubious platform? Considering the performance that can actually be harnessed by today's software, the platform's energy consumption is far too high. While Skulltrail theoretically offers the option of using SLI or CrossFire configurations, any single-socket system offers higher gaming performance at a much lower price.
The performance weaknesses of the Skulltrail motherboard's workstation chipset are its downfall. With games, the system falls behind the two single-CPU desktop systems by up to 45%.
In the benchmark suite, the two Core 2 Extreme QX9775 CPUs are even slower than a single QX9770. Although the Skulltrail dual-CPU system shows very strong performance gains in 3D rendering and video encoding tasks, its overall performance score is still hobbled by its gaming weakness. In the end, a single QX9650 Compare Prices on Core 2 Extreme QX9650 is only 3.9% slower overall than the two QX9775 Skulltrail chips together.
_________________ https://www.halfdonethings.com/
|
Sun Feb 24, 2008 10:21 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spockie-Tech
Site Admin
Joined: 31 May 2004
Posts: 3160
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Perhaps find (download, burn, copy from someone, get sent one free) a Linux Boot CD (Ubuntu or Mandriva if you would like help from Experienced Linux Gurus here).
Boot the system from the CD (It wont change your hard drive), and test to see if it boots ok and your network runs ok (or not).
If it does, The problem is in the windows software installation and you can look deeper into that area.
If it doesnt, you may have a faulty network chip and will have to disable the onboard card and fit a PCI network card instead (they're usually under $15)
Please clarify what you mean by "power ups before it will turn on" - does the power (light, fans etc) not come on at all until 2 or 3 button pushes, or does the power come on but windows fails to boot ? Does it get partway then stop ? Any errors reported ? At what point does it stop ? _________________ Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events. Small minds discuss people
|
Sat Jun 21, 2008 10:35 am |
|
|
|
|