|
|
|
|
|
Spockie-Tech
Site Admin
Joined: 31 May 2004
Posts: 3160
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Protecting a combat robot speed controller reliably is hard work..
In combat robotics we are always operating things on the edge of the envelope, with very little safety margin.. so its a fine line between operation and destruction..
If a Robot Speed Controller was designed for an industrial automation application, it would be 4x the size, weight and cost of the present ones we use.. but because we are all weight (and budget in most cases) limited, components have to work with very little breathing space.
To reliably detect this narrow space between "normal" operation, and "overload" is very difficult, especially when you have mere seconds to do so before things start to melt and go boom.
Normally, electronics (current / temperature sensing) is the best way to go, in fast-reactions situations like ours, but that adds a fair bit of cost and complexity to the system.. Jason and I are looking at designing a "Universal Current Limiter" that can be added to an IBC (or any other speed control) to help protect it, but that is still a few months off I'd guess..
The best solution would be to use a bigger controller. If you put a 400 amp controller in where only 200 amps is possible (due to battery limits), then you know you are very unlikely to blow it up. However, as I said, this solution is rarely practical in combat robots.
Fuses are OK for practice, but I wouldnt run one in a battle.. I'd hate to suffer hundreds of dollars worth of damage because a 5c hot fuse popped under impact and left me sitting dead.
I like the look of the Thermal Circuit breakers available from Bursons/Repco.. they're available up to 50amps and are quite small and light.. At least with them if you do have one fire in a match, you're only going to be still for 30 seconds (only!) until it cools off and recloses.
I tried to add a fan to one that only came on when the breaker popped to speed up the breaker reset-cycle, it worked well on the bench, but I forgot that the breaker would be seeing polaritys of both directions and with a widely varying "voltage" (well, PWM mark/space ratio), so the fan didnt like it very much and smoked in the bot. I'll have to rig up a bridge rectifier and a regulator which makes it a bit complicated for a fan-cooled cct breaker.
So Thermal Breakers are the best cheap solution that I know of at the moment.. (if you dont mind being occasionally still if your bot gets overloaded).
They're only a help though.. unless you have the weight, space and $$ to give yourself that safety margin of bigger controllers and/or current limiting, nothing will save you every time when you are running on the edge.. _________________ Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events. Small minds discuss people
|
Sun Feb 20, 2005 11:20 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|